Clinton, Bush slashed spending on levees
For 10 years, preventive maintenance was cut
While the Bush administration is sure to get most of the heat for cuts in proposed expenditures to maintain and upgrade New Orleans flood control system, the Clinton administration repeatedly cut congressional allocations for the projects and the recommendations on spending by the Army Corps of Engineers.
10 years ago, the Clinton administration cut 98 flood control projects, including one in New Orleans, saying such efforts should be local projects, not national.
A $120 million hurricane project, approved and financed annually from 1965 was killed by the Clinton administration after being approved by the Army Corps of Engineers. It was designed to protect more than 140,000 West Bank residents east of the Harvey Canal.
On June 9, John Zirschky, the acting assistant secretary of the Army and the official who refused to forward the report to Congress, sent a memo to the corps, saying the recommendation for the project "is not consistent with the policies and budget priorities reflected in the President's Fiscal Year 1996 budget. Accordingly, I will not forward the report to the Office of Management and Budget for clearance."
In 1999, Congress and the Clinton administration agreed to spend only $47 million on New Orleans area hurricane flood control projects � half of what local officials had requested.
Again, in 2000, Congress approved a $23.6 billion measure for water and energy programs, with sizable increases for several New Orleans area flood-control projects.
Clinton, however, promised to veto the annual appropriation for the Energy Department and Army Corps of Engineers, not because it was $890 million larger than he proposed, but because it did not include a plan to alter the levels of the Missouri River to protect endangered fish and birds.....
This probably why you don't hear Clinton criticising the President about this diasater.
J.R.
While the Bush administration is sure to get most of the heat for cuts in proposed expenditures to maintain and upgrade New Orleans flood control system, the Clinton administration repeatedly cut congressional allocations for the projects and the recommendations on spending by the Army Corps of Engineers.
10 years ago, the Clinton administration cut 98 flood control projects, including one in New Orleans, saying such efforts should be local projects, not national.
A $120 million hurricane project, approved and financed annually from 1965 was killed by the Clinton administration after being approved by the Army Corps of Engineers. It was designed to protect more than 140,000 West Bank residents east of the Harvey Canal.
On June 9, John Zirschky, the acting assistant secretary of the Army and the official who refused to forward the report to Congress, sent a memo to the corps, saying the recommendation for the project "is not consistent with the policies and budget priorities reflected in the President's Fiscal Year 1996 budget. Accordingly, I will not forward the report to the Office of Management and Budget for clearance."
In 1999, Congress and the Clinton administration agreed to spend only $47 million on New Orleans area hurricane flood control projects � half of what local officials had requested.
Again, in 2000, Congress approved a $23.6 billion measure for water and energy programs, with sizable increases for several New Orleans area flood-control projects.
Clinton, however, promised to veto the annual appropriation for the Energy Department and Army Corps of Engineers, not because it was $890 million larger than he proposed, but because it did not include a plan to alter the levels of the Missouri River to protect endangered fish and birds.....
This probably why you don't hear Clinton criticising the President about this diasater.
J.R.
posted by J.R. at
10:01:00 AM
2 Comments:
Bush will get blamed even though the levee that broke, was one that had just been upgraded !
You have an interesting way of attempting to spin information. Regardless of whether appropriate protection was funded, where is the relief? Why are people STILL dying? How can anyone explain why so many members of the frat boy's cabinet were "on vacation" - including the frat boy, himself - even days after a state of emergency existed? Is that really the kind of response you would embrace should a similar disaster occur in your area? Shame on you. This administration has taken the term "Greedy Predator" to a new extreme...
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home